30,000 statements, 250,000 names, millions of car license plates, but not a single computer. They were rarely invented.
All the information detectives collected were manually recorded and stored on a handwritten index card-isn’t it strange that the ripper team was overwhelmed by the paperwork?
The floor of the case room at the Milgers Police Station in Leeds city center had to be reinforced to handle the weight of the files in the cardboard boxes. Imagine if there was a flood or fire.
Over the past five years, as more women were cut and killed, clues pointing to Peter Sutcliffe grew in the vast pile of evidence.
He was interviewed nine times by police and his car was found 60 times in the red-light district where Ripper was wandering around the victims. It was all in that packed system.
West Yorkshire police were clearly not prepared for the scale of the investigation, as an elusive serial killer swung a hammer, knife, and screwdriver in northern England.
But don’t believe my words. Read the abominable words of the late Sir Lawrence Byford in his 1982 report on police investigations. “The inefficiency of the big case room is Ripper’s investigation.
“It was supposed to be an effective nerve center for the entire police force, but the backlog of raw information failed to connect important pieces of relevant information.
He continued: “This serious flaw in the central indexing system allowed Peter Sutcliffe to constantly slip through the net.”
But it wasn’t just the document avalanche that involved the detectives and delayed them for a long time in identifying the murderers.
They were also blinded by a troublemaker known as “wearside jack”. He led them in the pursuit of wild geese, pretending to be a loose killer and giving Sutcliff time to kill three more women in front of him. get caught.
John Humble convinces police that he should look for a man with a Sunderland accent, despite contradictory evidence from some Ripper survivors, for what is best known to himself. I sent a letter and an audio tape.
Sutcliffe was supposed to be at the top of the suspect list, but instead he slipped it down due to West Yorkshire accents and continued to kill him.
The FBI’s criminal profiler and the team’s own dialect analyst were needed to ultimately convince the senior detective that “Jack” was a blatant hoax. Humility was uncovered and imprisoned a few years later.
The Ripper case was also criticized by Misogyny’s allegations that police were convinced that Sutcliff was attacking only prostitutes. Victims who were not sex workers were initially ignored.
The idea was brought to Sutcliffe’s trial by Attorney General Michael Havers, who said of the victims:
“The last six attacks were against perfectly fine women.”
Sir Lawrence Byford’s intense report has made a big difference in policing. In particular, it has led to the development of computer systems that collate information more appropriately and facilitate cross-references.
We also allowed all police stations access to various databases.
Yorkshire Ripper: Police Mistakes That Allowed Peter Sutcliffe to Kill Three More Women | British News
SourceYorkshire Ripper: Police Mistakes That Allowed Peter Sutcliffe to Kill Three More Women | British News