The government hopes to start sending asylum seekers to Rwanda “in a matter of weeks”, according to Boris Johnson’s policy director.
The British government is trying to suppress the English Channel crossing in small boats as part of plans by the Home Office. signed the “first world” treaty with him Rwanda to send migrants to a landlocked African country.
The Interior Ministry said on Thursday that the first people sent to Rwanda would be officially notified in the coming weeks and the first flights would take place in the next few months.
However, Andrew Griffith, director of policy at No. 10, said it could work for “weeks.”
“It does not require new legislation, we think we can do it in accordance with existing conventions,” he told Newsnight.
“Therefore, it should be possible to implement this, launch it in weeks or several months, we are ready to go in that direction.
According to The Times, the Prime Minister wants the first flight to take place next month, և thousands of people will be relocated in the next few years.
120 million pounds “deviation”
Wales Secretary Simon Hart told Sky News that the deal would initially cost the UK մոտ 120 million.
Pritty Patel told a news conference in Kigali on Thursday that Britain and Rwanda had signed a new migration-economic development partnership to “end this deadly smuggling business”.
He said the move was a “significant contribution” to Rwanda’s development, which would improve the lives of those in the country.
“This is a global problem, where many countries are struggling to solve the challenges and the causes, there is no one or simple solution,” said the Minister of Internal Affairs.
He added that Rwanda is “a safe, secure country with respect for the rule of law, clearly a number of institutions that have evolved over time.”
The agreement has been widely criticizedLabor leader Sir Kir Starmer described it as a “pitiful diversion” from the party gates, and the Tory Reform Group called it “wrong and irresponsible”.
The Prime Minister defended the partnership, he said. “This is a morally correct, humanitarian, compassionate thing.
“We can not have people who continue to die at sea, paying huge sums of money to the pursuers of evil people who are simply exploiting their hopes and ambitions.
“We must encourage them to follow a safe and legal path if they want to come to this country.”
View from Rwanda
Criticism of the agreement has also been voiced in Rwandawhen the country’s opposition leader insists that his country should not deal with British migratory flows.
Victor Ingabire told Sky News: “If our people do not need enough food, if our children or the children of Rwanda do not have the opportunity to go to school because of poverty, how will the Rwandan government educate the children?” refugees?
However, some Rwandans who spoke to Sky News seemed to support the scheme.
“They can be called migrants or otherwise, but they are just people,” Eric told Shingi Mararike in Kigali.
“We are all one human race.”
The human rights situation in Rwanda is in doubt
Human rights groups have condemned the move as inhumane, while others have said it was a waste of money.
According to Freedom House, a non-profit organization funded by the US government, Rwanda has a poor track record of civil rights and civil liberties.
The organization’s 2022 report on Rwanda states that “children are subjected to domestic trafficking in harsh domestic conditions,” with many working in “informal agriculture.”
“Young Congolese ուր Burundian refugees are vulnerable to sexual exploitation and forced recruitment into armed groups linked to Rwandan security forces,” it added.
Mr Johnson acknowledged there would be legal challenges, but promised to hire “politically motivated lawyers” to prevent co-operation in the courts.
UK may send first migrants to Rwanda in ‘weeks’ | Political news
Source UK may send first migrants to Rwanda in ‘weeks’ | Political news