The contrast between Boris Johnson and Jurgen Klopp couldn’t be more striking. the liverpool manager would make a great statesman. He is honest, takes responsibility, cares about people in worse situations than him, and does his best to contribute to the larger society.
The Prime Minister is quite the opposite.
When Klopp talks about politics, it makes sense. When Johnson pontificates about football, it’s more of the same bluster that has characterized his entire career. On Monday, according to some sections of the media, Johnson ‘slapped’ Klopp because the 54-year-old suggested it might be worth exploring at least why Liverpool fans booed the national anthem and the Queen’s grandson ahead of Saturday’s FA Cup final. A spokesman said the Prime Minister disagreed with Klopp and called the behavior of the fans a “great disgrace”. It takes quite a deranged rotation to see this as a slap. Klopp probably didn’t even notice that he’s supposed to have been put in his place.
Like Klopp and Johnson, those who booed the anthem and those who were angered by the teasing are unlikely to find common ground. Will there ever be a day when Liverpool supporters embrace the patriotic experience?
The Prime Minister’s spokesman spoke of shame, an emotion Johnson knows little about. He does not have it. Or empathy. The viewerThe Merseyside attack under the 57-year-old in 2004 is well known. The editorial column said the people of Liverpool “consider themselves victims whenever possible and resent their victim status; yet at the same time they wallow in it”. The article continued to repeat lies about Hillsborough.
What is less well known is Johnson’s supposed mea culpa in the next edition of The viewer. Titled ‘What I Should Apologize For’, the piece was written from ‘a cold, damp three-star hotel in Liverpool’ after the elderly Etonian was ordered to travel north to apologize to Michael Howard , who was then the leader of the Conservative Party. Party (and a Liverpool fan, much to the embarrassment of many Kopites).
“Operation Scouse-grovel”, as the author describes it, is as obscene as the previous editorial. Johnson doubled down. He wrote: “Whatever its errors of fact and taste, for which I am sorry, last week’s editorial brought up a good point: about false sentiment, self-pity, risk, and our refusal to see that we can sometimes be the authors of our misfortunes.
Almost every week, Liverpool supporters hear the echo of the words of the man who holds Britain’s highest political office. “You killed your own fans.” “Always the victims.” “The sun was right, you are murderers.
Is there a ‘feeling more wrong’ than getting emotional about a national anthem? The royal family is the cornerstone of the class system. The idolatry of a dynastic institution completely removed from ordinary people baffles much of Liverpool’s supporters, especially those with a close view of the growing poverty in the UK. The Fans Supporting Foodbanks initiative was founded outside Goodison Park and Anfield – it’s often forgotten that Evertonians are also the target of anti-Scouse invective. Fans from club after club come to Merseyside and rejoice in songs that poke fun at poverty. Some Chelsea fans were chanting hunger on Saturday. Liverpool’s end booed an inherited institutional privilege. Guess by which the nation was outraged? It was two days before the Governor of the Bank of England warned of “apocalyptic” food price hikes.
Hunger is central to the historical perception of the people of Liverpool. The port, once known as “Torytown” and “the second city of the empire”, first fell out of step with the rest of England after the potato famine in the 1840s. Millions of starving Irish people have landed on the banks of the Mersey. Many stayed. Liverpool’s ‘otherness’ dates back to the mid-19th century.
What does it have to do with football? A lot. The word “Scouse” is a slur that has been reappropriated by those against whom it was used. In Liverpool’s poorer neighborhoods a century ago, malnourished locals – who were the children of immigrants and identified primarily as Irish – relied on soup kitchens and cheap street vendors for food . What they were served was Scouse, a watery stew. Scouser was a derogatory term used to make fun of the poor. When “Feed the Scousers” resonates in the stadiums, it expresses a deep folk memory imbued with anti-migrant and anti-Irish sentiment. Those who sing it may not be aware of the history, but the driving forces behind their behavior date back decades. Nowhere else is poverty so flouted by outsiders. Nobody sings “Feed the Geordies” or “Feed the Mancs” even though other places have much poorer areas. No wonder the citizens of Liverpool are fired up by the chants.
Under these circumstances, it’s hard to convince Scousers to do anything but boo the national anthem. And then we come to Hillsborough. Britain is still expected to be in a state of uproar over the 1989 disaster that left 97 people dead. High-ranking police and high-level politicians lied about what happened, covered up the mistakes of officials, and blamed innocent supporters. The national press, on the whole, either amplified the establishment narrative or failed to provide adequate scrutiny of the authorities. A substantial percentage of the British public will still not accept the findings of the longest and most comprehensive inquiries in the country’s history. To top it off, the officers responsible for the mass death and cover-up have been acquitted of any wrongdoing – even after some of those people admitted their guilt in court. Today, the biggest miscarriage of justice in the country’s history is reduced to jokes about football. Which country. Play this anthem again so we can all participate.
The FA also fared well. The governing body staged a semi-final on a pitch that did not have a security certificate. Tottenham Hotspur fans nearly missed eight years earlier on the same Leppings Lane terraces where carnage occurred in 1989. stay with me was disrupted, the FA did nothing to respect the bereaved and the survivors of an avoidable disaster at one of their showpiece matches.
The events of the weekend illustrated how toxic attitudes towards Hillsborough have become. Family members of the dead have been heavily abused on social media by trolls who have used Saturday’s events as an excuse to harass those who have fought unsuccessfully for justice.
So what would it take to stop Liverpool fans from interrupting the national anthem? There is a simple answer: don’t play it. We don’t want to hear it. Contempt oozes from every word, from every note.
And we don’t want to hear any complaints about the Scousers being disrespectful. Boos are a cry for justice, for equality, a howl against hunger and poverty. It is depressing that so many people in Britain cannot hear this. Klopp heard it. Johnson never will.
This is why Liverpool fans boo the national anthem and this is what would stop it
Source link This is why Liverpool fans boo the national anthem and this is what would stop it