Jacob Rees-Mogg said plans to cut more than 90,000 civilian jobs to cut living costs by billions of pounds would not mean a return on savings.
During a working day with Cabinet ministers in Stoke-on-Trent on Thursday Prime Minister He asked the government ministers to submit a report within a month how they can reduce the number of their departmental workforce until 2016
The move would cut about 47 percent of the 475,000-strong workforce, which the government says would save about միլի 3.5 billion a year.
The minister told Sky News on Friday Brexit: Opportunities և Government efficiency Jacob Reese-Mog He said the government was trying to “return the civil service to normal” after taking on “additional people with special needs”, including COVID-19: և Brexit.
To the question whether the reduction of the number of civil servants means a return to savings, Mr. Reese-Mogg said: “I do not think it’s because what is being done is going back to the level of efficiency we had in 2016.”
He said the easiest way to reduce staffing was to “freeze staff” as “up to 38,000 people leave the civil service each year”.
Mr. Rhys-Mogg added: “But in some departments, you can achieve efficiency through automation, the addition of technology, which all sensible businesses will do is quite sensible, sensible ambitions.”
He continued. “The only ideological thing is that we should spend taxpayers’ money correctly, not waste it..
“It’s all about doing everything right. To manage it effectively, to realize that every penny we take from taxes must come from the backs of hard-working people. ”
The announcement by the head of the FDA Civil Servants Union was described as “either a ploy to capture the headlines or a reckless cut to burn public services.”
This comes at a time when Mr Johnson is pushing for more to address the cost-of-living crisis, which has pushed inflation to its highest level in three decades. Thor MPs are pushing for tax cuts, while Labor has accused him of being “devoid of ideas.”
The prime minister told the Daily Mail, who was the first to announce the planned cuts, that the civil service had “swelled” during the epidemic.
He added. “Every pound that the government has prevented from taxpayers is the amount of money they can spend on their own priorities, on their own lives.”
The statement apparently echoed the Prime Minister’s comments during the Queen’s speech earlier this week, when he spoke of the need to “cut government spending.”
According to ITV News, the Prime Minister and the Chancellor met on Monday to begin work on a plan that would include a ban on filling vacancies without the special permission of ministers.
“The prime minister and the ministers are clear that the civil service is doing a great job for the public, bringing progress to the government’s priorities.”
“But when people and businesses across the country are facing rising costs, the public justifiably expects their government to set an example and work as efficiently as possible.”
The civil service unions are already opposing the ministers, led by Jacob Rees-Mog, who are trying to: Put pressure on civil servants who worked from home during the epidemic to return to Whitehall desks.
FDA Secretary General Dave Penman wrote on his Twitter page: “Eventually they can reduce the civil service to the level of 2016, but they have to decide what the civil service should do after that.
“Will the passport be reduced or the Department of Health and Social Protection?
“As long as they do not have a serious plan, it is either a ploy to capture the headlines or a reckless cut in public services without thinking or worrying about the consequences.”
Speaking to Sky News on Friday, Mr Reese-Mogg acknowledged that “there is a place to work from home”, but said that public services were sometimes negatively affected by telecommuting.
The Labor spokesman said. “The cabinet said they would focus on the costs of the crisis facing families across the country.
“Instead of implementing the emergency budget, they chose to disappoint the working people again through meaningless rhetoric and inaction.”
During the discussion on the effectiveness of the civil service, Mr. Reese-Moggie noted that he had arrived at his morning broadcast with several advisers.
Asked if everyone was needed, he said: “They all do not work for me directly. “They work in the government office, both of them are my special advisers.”
The value of life. 90,000 redundancy plans are not a return on savings, says Jacob Rees-Mogg | Political news
Source The value of life. 90,000 redundancy plans are not a return on savings, says Jacob Rees-Mogg | Political news