Judge TOP demanded that police officers who asked him to sign an investigation warrant for VIP child sexual abuse should be investigated.
Former Justice of the Peace Howard Riddle said “reasonable reasons for suspecting criminal offenses” were committed.
Riddle signed the warrant To allow police officers to search the homes of senior politicians and military officers-including former Army Chief of Staff Sir Bramor and former Interior Minister Leon Brittan.
He argues that if police officers told him about the credibility of their witness “Nick” (sick pedophile and liar Karl Beech), the warrant would never have been given.
writing Daily mail, He states: “If the person responsible for the application knows the facts that undermine the credibility of the witnesses and does not disclose them, the application for an investigation warrant will upset the path of justice.
“Turning the path of justice is a serious criminal offense and in most cases imprisonment.”
He added: “Judges and security judges issuing investigative warrants must be able to rely on the accuracy and completeness of the information sworn before them.
“They need to know that in the rare and exceptional cases of deliberate misunderstanding, actions are taken to upset the path of justice.”
Riddle, a senior district judge in England and Wales from 2010 to 2016, claims he did not conduct a “rigorous” investigation, requiring an independent unit to investigate the work of police guard dogs. It states.
In July 2019, Nick was convicted of lying about Westminster’s VIP pedophile ring.
Karl Buna, 53, spun an “abnormal story” about “murder of three children, multiple rapes, kidnappings, imprisonment, and widespread sexual abuse”, causing a £ 2.5 million witch hunt. It was.
But in the terrible twist of “breathtaking hypocrisy,” Beech was a pedophile himself interested in pre-teen boys.
He was convicted with 12 counts After just four hours of deliberation at the Newcastle Crown Court, it distorted the path of justice and one of the jury frauds.
The fraud is related to the payment of a £ 22,000 criminal injury that he falsely claimed to have been raped by Jimmy Savile.
A jury in the 2019 proceedings said in 2014 police were raped and abused for nine years by a VIP pedophile gang called a “group” in the 1970s.
He claimed that the abuse occurred at former Prime Minister Ted Heath’s home, and at Dolphin Square, Carlton Club, Stowe School, London Zoo, and military bases.
This led to a multi-million-pound investigation, codenamed “Operation Midland,” in which police officers attacked the homes of 12 seniors and celebrities.
Beech also said in a police interview for more than 20 hours that he was holding the hand of a dying boy. He was killed in front of him by former Tory lawmaker Harvey Proctor.
Politicians were forced to deny that “he was a sadistic child killer and committed other serious sexual crimes.”
He said their assault had sacrificed his home and the work he had worked for the Duchess of Rutland after the trial, and was still to settle the claim against the Metropolitan Police Department. Told.
Among those also accused was Sir Bramor, a former British Army chief. A 64-year-old wife died during an investigation before his name was revealed.
Beech bravely told police in a few hours of tearful police interviews how his late stepfather, Major Army, raped him.
He sobbed in the 1970s and 1980s, claiming that he had been tortured at a military base and handed over to a general for sadistic sexual abuse by someone at another facility.
Beech nominated former Prime Minister Sir Edward Heath, Proctor, and accused Savill and security chief Sir Michael Hanley, MI5 chief, and MI6 boss Sir Maurice Oldfield in the gang.
The investigation attacked the homes of powerful figures, including 91-year-old Normandy veteran Sir Bramor, an army marshal.
He hit the table in front of him and denied in an interview that he had a sexual interest in the children.
Another false accusation, General Hugh Beach, 96, told the jury via a videolink that his allegations were “beyond grotesque.”
The Supreme Court demands that a detective face a criminal investigation in a VIP child abuse investigation and may go to jail to “distort justice.”
SourceThe Supreme Court demands that a detective face a criminal investigation in a VIP child abuse investigation and may go to jail to “distort justice.”