United Kingdom

Northern Ireland Protocol. Ministers pay attention to legal consequences amid conspiracy to thwart NI deal | Political news

The government plans to publish legislation to repeal the Northern Ireland Protocol, but Sky News understands that the Cabinet has not yet agreed to the resolution.

It: Democratic Union Party (DUP) demand the removal of the contractual trade border in the Irish Sea before they resume energy exchange at Stormont.

Sources close to the discussion say the ministers are concerned that the bill could become ineffective if the government is deemed to have violated international law.

What is the Northern Ireland Protocol and why is it important?

Given the apparent potential for resistance in parliament, they may have to include defense, which means that any action must comply with the withdrawal agreement.

Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union increased the prospect of a tough border between Northern Ireland (UK) and the Republic of Ireland (EU).

To avoid this, the British government relinquished its trade frontier in the Irish Sea, within the “GB” of Northern Ireland, but the Unionists felt betrayed.

Under pressure from the DUP, the British government has repeatedly accused the EU of lacking flexibility in conducting customs controls.

Sky News understands the legislation being drafted by the Minister of Foreign Affairs Liz Trass Will effectively eliminate the maritime border to restore energy exchange.

There are six main elements.

  • Green line for trusted merchants transporting goods to Northern Ireland և red line for goods for the Republic of Ireland
  • Increase of penalties for violations և smuggling
  • Events that enable companies to produce products that meet UK standards in Northern Ireland
  • Transfer of jurisdiction from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to the courts of the United Kingdom
  • Providing Northern Ireland with the same VAT cuts as the rest of the UK
  • A clear promise that the UK will never establish border infrastructure between the “Republic” of Northern Ireland

The Prime Minister is struggling with some of his EU MPs

Rob Powell

Political correspondent


By introducing legislation that appears to violate international law, Boris Johnson is battling not only the EU but also some of his MPs, members of the House of Lords.

The Conservative chairman of the Northern Ireland Electoral Commission, Simon Hoar, said today that the move “would be an indelible mark on our country’s reputation” and called on colleagues to ask them “what would we say if the Labor government did that?”

Senior MP Thor Roger Gale was just as furious to say that Boris Johnson signed the Brexit agreement in 2019, with which he ran in the general election campaign.

“It simply came to our notice then. “Boris Johnson is responsible for that. Our word is our connection. If we say we’re going to do something, it’s necessary,” said the Kent MP.

Former Secretary of State Andrew Mitchell, who has been involved in previous Brexit disputes, said he was “generally tired” of the development, but added that “it could provoke a shootout that no one would win.”

Former Prime Minister Theresa May is also known to oppose the plan, saying on Tuesday that her Brexit deal would avoid the Irish sea border.

“The government needs to consider not only some of the immediate issues, but also the broader meaning of what such a move might say about the UK’s willingness to abide by the treaties it has signed,” Ms May told the Commons.

The wider discrepancy found by some lawmakers is the image of the UK, which signs defense agreements, presents itself as a credible player in the global arena of Russian aggression, while rejecting trade agreements, and threatens to violate international law in other areas.

That being said, Boris Johnson, with an armed majority, is likely to get in the way if the legislation finds its way to the Communities.

However, he will face tougher resistance in the Lords, where the Conservatives outnumber the red benches.

The transfer of control from the ECHR to the courts of the United Kingdom is just one example of a government that may be considered to have violated international law.

Follow the Daily podcastApple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Loudspeaker:

The debate over the need for defense to enter parliament calls into question the legal advice given by the Prosecutor General last week.

The government’s chief legal adviser, Suella Braverman, has approved the repeal of much of the protocol by emergency legislation, describing the action as “painfully necessary”.

Please use Chrome browser for more affordable video player

The “last thing the EU wants” is tensions in the UK

Irish Foreign Minister Simon Cowney has said that there will be a “landing area” for an agreement if Britain և the EU works together. Condemns United Kingdom ” Holy Shout ”.

She told Sky News’ Sophy Ridge On Sunday program: “Ireland is also disappointed.

“We are now dealing with the aftermath of the British people’s decision on our country, which has cost us hundreds of millions of euros, which is jeopardizing the peace process and its institutions on the island of Ireland.

“So where we focus on the frustrations, we have to think beyond Westminster.”

Northern Ireland Protocol. Ministers pay attention to legal consequences amid conspiracy to thwart NI deal | Political news

Source Northern Ireland Protocol. Ministers pay attention to legal consequences amid conspiracy to thwart NI deal | Political news

Back to top button