Victim of fraudulent surgeon Iain Patterson imprisoned in 2017 for unnecessary execution Surgery Said to the patient Independent There was a “clear and present danger” that similar crimes would be committed without taking urgent action.
On Tuesday, the government released a partial response to an independent investigation led by Rev. Graham James, which was reported last February. Patterson found that the “dysfunctional” health care system and the willful blindness of managers allowed more than 1,000 patients to undergo unnecessary surgery in 14 years.
The government’s response addressed only three recommendations directly, with the minister promising a full response later this year.
David Rowland, director of the Center for Health and the Public Interest, says the NHS has more patients Private hospital Triggered by a coronavirus pandemic. As many as 3 million NHS patients may have been treated personally, and this number could increase as the NHS tackles a huge backlog in the coming months.
Roland said: “The government’s response does not even indicate that it takes the risks associated with providing services within private hospitals seriously.”
He said the minister had been repeatedly warned of safety risks. “Clearly there is systemic risk and behind the government, it seems only a political choice not to intervene to take action to protect patients. Private hospitals in the provision of NHS services. Expanding the role of the sector.
“By not taking action now to intervene to make private hospitals safer, they are deliberately exposing more NHS patients to the same risks identified in the study.”
Last week it was revealed that Spire Healthcare secured £ 22m. This is because the recall of 5,500 Patterson patients identified new victims who underwent unnecessary surgery and procedures.
Deborah Douglas, victim of Iain Patterson, said Independent: “There is still a clear and present danger that another Patterson will occur. They are not really working on the complexities, and the longer this lasts, the more likely it will happen again.”
She states: “The recommendations they answered are all the soft ones that should have already been made anyway. All the while, I’m trying not to address some of the important issues, or at least to give us a plan. I think it’s scary. So far, I don’t buy the fact that they couldn’t plan on a timescale of 15 recommendations. “
The Minister’s statement does not address key issues such as a single mandatory database of UK consultants recording all their performance data, where they work, and research suggestions that they take steps. It was.
It also did not address the issue of privileged practice of allowing private doctors like Patterson to effectively rent hospital space to treat patients. They are not considered employees and companies can try to avoid liability for what happened in the hospital if there are safety concerns or allegations of clinical negligence.
In the case of Iain Patterson, his insurer has left and the NHS, Spire Healthcare, and insurers have paid £ 37 million to about 750 patients for a major out-of-court battle. That’s what happened when I urged.
Kashmir Uppal, a partner at law firm Shoosmiths and representing patients who file claims against Paterson and Spire Healthcare, told Independent: Responsibility and compensation. Otherwise, the safety of patients in the private sector will always remain an issue. The lack of control mechanisms that exist in the NHS ensures that physicians with clinical privileges act appropriately and in the best interests of the patient.
“If the hospital is directly responsible to the doctor, much more control is possible. If this issue of practicing privileges and the resulting liability and compensation provisions are not addressed, This is an open competition for this to happen again.
“There remains a law that private hospitals that give privileges to doctors are not responsible for their actions or omissions.”
Minister of Patient Safety in a written statement to Congress Nadine DorriesCondemned Covid-19’s pandemic for forcing an investigation into what she called a “practical response.”
She describes Patterson’s research report as “hard to read, personal misconduct, and the terrible harm that can occur when a fraudulent surgeon is not checked. We continue to make all recommendations. We will consider and fully respond to the 15 recommendations for inquiries during 2021. “
Of the 15 recommendations, the government responded to only three. One, in a letter from a doctor, with clearer communication with the patient, said Ms. Dolly’s would be added to the standard NHS contract, which the study specifically mentioned in the individual. It does not apply to patients.
The General Medical Council was asked to work with physicians to incorporate a better approach to patient consent, and the Care Quality Commission ensured that hospital teams properly met and discussed patient care. I will.
David Hare, Chief Executive Officer of the Independent Healthcare Providers Network, said: Both independent and NHS providers.
“This is reflected in the Sector’s independent assessment by the Care Quality Commission, where 84% of all independent sector hospitals are currently rated as good or superior, which is broader in the UK. It is advantageous compared to the medical system. “
Minister accused of “intentionally exposing” patients to risk after partial response to the Patterson scandal
Source link Minister accused of “intentionally exposing” patients to risk after partial response to the Patterson scandal