Entertainment

Lisa Wilkinson: Controversy over whether Karl Stefanović snubbed the wedding

Karl Stefanović It is possible that he did not deliberately “snub” his today’s co-host Lisa Wilkinson when he was unable to attend the renewal of his vows with his husband Peter FitzSimons in October 2017.

Wilkinson, 61, claims in her new autobiography that Stefanović’s Noshaw was the last straw in their troubled relationship-knowing she’s about to be fired from Channel Nine. So I went to the point where it meant he refused the invitation.

However, the story has been disputed by guests attending the ceremony, many of which. Australian person They didn’t know it was a wedding until they arrived.

Karl Stefanović may not have deliberately “snubbed” today’s co-host Lisa Wilkinson when she was unable to attend the renewal of her vows with her husband Peter FitzSimons in October 2017. ..

If this was the case and Stefanović was not previously told to celebrate Wilkinson and Fitzsimons renewing his vow, his decision to withdraw at the very end would definitely be Wilkinson’s it. It was not that it was realized.

It’s unclear if Stefanović, 47, noticed that his co-anchor and her 25-year-old husband were planning to renew their vows, or was simply said to be a party.

Anyway, Wilkinson kept in mind Stefanović’s last-minute cancellation, which effectively marked the end of their personal and professional relationship.

The Daily Mail Australia is asking Channel Nine for comment.

Wilkinson, 61, claims in her new autobiography that Stefanović's Noshaw was the last straw in their troubled relationship-knowing she's about to be fired from Channel Nine. So I went to the point where it meant he refused the invitation.Photo: Wilkinson and her husband Peter FitzSimons at the October 6, 2017 Pledge Renewal Ceremony

Wilkinson, 61, claims in her new autobiography that Stefanović’s Noshaw was the last straw in their troubled relationship-knowing she’s about to be fired from Channel Nine. So I went to the point where it meant he refused the invitation.Photo: Wilkinson and her husband Peter FitzSimons at the October 6, 2017 Pledge Renewal Ceremony

The story was disputed by guests attending the ceremony, many of whom said they didn't know it was a wedding until they arrived at the Australians.Wilkinson and Fitzsimons are portrayed at the ceremony with their children, Billi, Jake and Louis.

The story was disputed by guests attending the ceremony, many of whom said they didn’t know it was a wedding until they arrived at the Australians.Wilkinson and Fitzsimons are portrayed at the ceremony with their children, Billi, Jake and Louis.

Wilkinson lifted the lid with an excerpt from her new book on the last day he worked at the Today Show. The Sunday Telegraph..

She claimed that Stefanović gave her a cold shoulder a few weeks before her dismissal. It was prompted when she demanded a significant salary increase.

She and Fitz Simons explained that they invited Stefanović and his partner Jasmine Yarbro to the October 2017 25th Anniversary Pledge Renewal Ceremony.

However, two days before the event, Stefanović allegedly contacted Fitz Simons and stated that he would not attend because he had extended his vacation abroad.

‘Then in 10 days [the ceremony] Karl hadn’t contacted me at all for almost 11 years as his co-host. There are no phone messages, no texts, no apologies, no simple congratulations. It’s completely silent, “Wilkinson claimed.

After returning to work, she claimed that Stefanović did not ask her about her holidays, and he did not apologize for being a “no show at the wedding.”

“For the next two hours, I didn’t exchange a word with Karl outside the script, because for the first time I didn’t believe I would” play well, “she said.

Wilkinson went on to say that she was “quietly smoking.” It was done only by Karl. “

“For two hours I was sitting there feeling completely useless. Today’s show was now a curl show. What was the point of being there?” She added.

Wilkinson wondered when she learned that she had been fired later that day:’This was the reason [Karl] Haven’t you attended the wedding and talked to me since then? So didn’t he say a word about the strange devastation of the show that morning? ”

On the other hand, this is not the first time that Wilkinson’s future autobiographical fact, “It didn’t make sense to be like this,” was contested.

The book, released next week, contains a chapter dedicated to her dismissal from Channel Nine and dropping out with Stefanović in a wage dispute.

She claims that in August 2015 Stefanović proposed to work together to renegotiate the nine contracts-as the cast of American Sitcom Friends mediate a better deal with NBC. It is different from the method of cooperating famously with.

But she claims that he abandoned this idea and instead had rival Network Nine and Seven play against each other to secure a better deal for himself.

“A few weeks later … the media was flooded with stories of Stefanović being restless today, looking for more lush meadows and more civilized working hours on Channel Seven,” she said. I am writing.

Stefanović soon became the center of the bidding war between Nine and Seven, and as a result he resigned a five-year contract with Nine worth at least $ 2 million a year.

Wilkinson traded significantly less, about $ 780,000 a year, only for two years.

“There was no doubt about it. Karl certainly knew the technique of trading,” she wrote.

However, this account reportedly does not tell a complete story. News.com.au In this week’s report, Wilkinson actually earned more than Stefanović when he first joined forces today. It wasn’t until the end of the partnership that the roles were reversed.

This abominable article, which disagrees with Wilkinson’s most important claim to withdraw from the Today Show, is reported to have led book publishers to a big spin.

HarperCollins Australia has requested that a preview copy of the memoirs be returned from the news website after the article is published, sources told the Daily Mail Australia.

In an article written by respected political journalist Samantha Maiden, Nine sources challenged Wilkinson’s claim that he had “doubled” the amount Stefanović earned.

In fact, they claim that it was Wilkinson who was paid much more than Stefanović “for years” after the pair first teamed up for Nine’s breakfast staple in 2006.

‘News.com.au understands that she made over $ 700,000 when she first signed to Nine in 2006. Stefanović, a rookie who has just returned from coverage in Los Angeles, has earned less than half of that for years as a TV couple co-sponsored Nine’s breakfast TV show, “the article said.

It was only a few years later that Stefanović negotiated the path to the now infamous salary increase and his salary surged to $ 2 million a year.

However, the opposition to Wilkinson’s first nine contract did not go well with her book publisher. One insider claimed that news.com.au was ordered to return the company’s only preview copy.

“They blew up and asked to get their copy back,” said the website insider.

News.com.au editor Lisa Muxworthy declined to comment when contacted by the Daily Mail Australia. A HarperCollins spokesperson refused to confirm the allegations.

Lisa Wilkinson: Controversy over whether Karl Stefanović snubbed the wedding

Source link Lisa Wilkinson: Controversy over whether Karl Stefanović snubbed the wedding

Back to top button