Achieving Balance: The Core-Satellite Investment Approach
Finding the equilibrium between safety and growth in investments often poses a challenge. I frequently confront the decision between allocating funds to secure, stable assets with limited growth potential or venturing into high-risk, high-reward options. The former ensures peace of mind with predictable but modest returns, while the latter, though anxiety-inducing, holds the allure of significant profits. The solution lies in embracing a hybrid approach: the ‘core-satellite’ investment strategy. This method involves directing a substantial portion of funds into stable options like ETFs, investment funds, or global equity funds. These diversified investments typically yield conservative returns, averaging around 5% annually, yet offer resilience against market volatility. Meanwhile, a smaller portion of the portfolio is allocated to high-growth assets such as individual shares in booming sectors like technology and energy. While these investments carry increased risk due to environmental, economic, and geopolitical factors, they offer the potential for substantial returns, sometimes exceeding 20% in a single year. By diversifying across stable and high-growth assets, the core-satellite approach aims to strike a balance between risk and reward, optimizing portfolio performance while managing potential downsides.
Core investing
An instance is the iShares S&P 500 ETF (LSE:IUSA), offering exposure to prominent US companies like Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, and Amazon. Managed by BlackRock, the fund distributes investments across stocks within the S&P 500 index, renowned as one of the top-performing US indexes.
Over the last decade, the iShares S&P 500 ETF has yielded an annualized return of 12.48%, slightly surpassing its S&P 500 benchmark. It only underperformed the S&P 500 average once in 2014. Nonetheless, as it’s tied to a singular US index, it remains vulnerable to economic risks specific to the country. Furthermore, the S&P 500 carries a significant tech weighting, amplifying exposure to risks inherent in this sector.
Satellite investing
Consider Meta, Facebook’s parent company (NASDAQ: META), as an illustration. Over the past decade, this mega-cap US stock has surged by 631%, yielding impressive annualized returns of 22%. While Meta is also included in the iShares S&P 500, direct investment in it would have nearly doubled the returns. However, if Meta were to falter, all invested funds could be lost, unlike a diversified portfolio which would only incur a minor setback.
Currently, Meta boasts a relatively high price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 25, slightly exceeding the industry average but aligning with other major tech firms. Despite its remarkable 63% growth in the past year, outpacing the US market thricefold, further gains may be challenging. CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s significant investment in AI represents a speculative venture that could yield substantial rewards or significant losses, with the outcome uncertain.
Hence, diversification remains paramount. I prefer to allocate approximately 60% of my portfolio to funds and 40% to individual shares.