United Kingdom

Home Office: New Deportation Act May Discriminate against Ethnic Minorities | Immigration and Asylum

The· Home office New immigration rules for criminalizing and deporting immigrant rough sleepers recognize that they may discriminate against ethnic minorities, including Asian women who have survived domestic violence.

Internal documents outline how the new power is-how the department’s analysis Caused widespread anger When it goes into effect four months ago, it also indirectly affects at-risk groups, including people with disabilities.

Equality Impact Assessment on page 8 obtained by Freedom investigateAccepts the possibility of a rule of indirect discrimination on the grounds of race, as several factors leading to homelessness affect people of a particular ethnic group in a disproportionate manner. “The main reason Asian women give to be homeless is because of domestic violence,” said the assessment.

Campaign Group Director, Pragana Patel Thousand Black SistersThe document, published under the Information Disclosure Act, said it showed a ruthless attitude towards migrants who became homeless due to domestic violence.

Last month, Home Secretary Priti Patel cited the government’s domestic violence bill as one of several steps the government took to ensure it. Women’s safety after the murder of Sarah Evalard..

“Similarly, they say they intend to introduce this measure around violent sleep, knowing that it will affect victims of domestic violence,” Planya Patel said.

The document also acknowledges that a person with a disability who sleeps poorly may “experience a greater disadvantage” if deported to a country with inadequate access to support services.

Disability affects most of the homeless population. The Interior Ministry’s Impact Assessment acknowledges Scottish figures showing that more than half of those seeking homeless help also needed support for one or more of various conditions such as mental illness, drug addiction, and learning disabilities. ..

The new immigration rules state that they do not discriminate illegally.Disclosure will take place a few days after the Interior Ministry Sign legal agreement With the Equality Watchdog, which turned out last year that the ministry could not assess the impact of hostile environmental policies on the Windrush generation.

Chai Patel, Director of Legal Policy Immigration Welfare Joint Council, States as follows. “The Ministry of Interior is still strangled in discrimination caused by a hostile environment. Both the Equality and Human Rights Commission and independent Windlash reviewers, Priti Patel and her department, are caused by that policy. We look forward to investigating and eliminating racism and other discrimination so as not to exacerbate them. “

The new immigration rules created a rough bed for denying or revoking permission to stay in the UK, causing a boycott threat by councils and charities when the Interior Ministry changed immigration law last December.

However, Immigration officials have not been used yet as they are told not to use it until the official guidance on the application is published.

According to the report, discretionary rules are used for “people who refuse to provide support and choose to engage in antisocial behavior that harms other individuals or the wider society.”

Interior Ministry documents conclude that discrimination on the grounds of race, disability, or other protected traits is not direct and is “not automatically illegal.”

He adds that the use of power can be justified by “a legitimate purpose of protecting the people.”

The report adds that the immigration system “prevents discrimination,” allowing departmental decision makers to consider, for example, whether a person’s disability has contributed to becoming homeless.

Still, activists say the Interior’s discretion is not an appropriate safeguard for vulnerable people.

“The Home Office is widely believed to be institutionally racist,” said James Turret, chief executive officer of Essex and the London Refugee Immigration Forum, which initiated a judicial review of the rules. .. “The idea that the Home Office uses that discretion feels more like a guarantee of discrimination than a protective measure.”

Cases where the Home Office has been criticized for handling deportation decisions affecting persons with disabilities include 22-year-old autistic diaper brown from Dudley, who is facing deportation to Jamaica. Brown was sentenced to five years in prison for robbing a friend’s cell phone in 2018. This was a crime he denied and was automatically eligible for deportation.

Brown left Jamaica at the age of four and has no family or support. A friend says that deportation is equivalent to a “death sentence.”

A home office spokesman said: Decision makers are rigorously trained to see where factors that mitigate problems such as disability and race play a role in an individual’s situation, and we provide support with this in mind. “

Home Office: New Deportation Act May Discriminate against Ethnic Minorities | Immigration and Asylum

SourceHome Office: New Deportation Act May Discriminate against Ethnic Minorities | Immigration and Asylum

Back to top button