United Kingdom

Experts warn against crixism at the end of the G7 meeting

London, May 5 (Xinhua)-As the G7 Foreign Minister and Development Minister’s first meeting in two years ended here on Wednesday, authorities said the COVID-19 pandemic, the post-climate economy. Changes that have vowed to work on recovery, and security issues in various regions.

However, experts say that clubs in developed countries are less comprehensive and are insufficient to address global challenges if they seek exclusion of a particular country for reasons such as idealism or political differences. It states that it may be revealed. LIKE-MINDED or NARROW-MINDED

To build an alliance of “similar” countries, the G7 invited representatives of the European Union, Australia, India, South Africa and South Africa and Brunei, the chair of this year’s Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). .. 3-day meeting.

However, experts say it may not be easy to overcome the divisions between countries and groups, especially those relating to China, and therefore it is impossible to keep China out of the expanding alliance.

“For many, China is an essential trading partner,” Kylie Turku, a professor of economics at the Chicago-based Illinois Institute of Technology, told the Wednesday.

“For example, industrial groups such as the Federation of German Industries (BDI) in Germany and the Keidanren in Japan, as well as chaebols in South Korea, are all eager to work with China to build projects in third (BRI) countries.” Told. He added. “India, the largest beneficiary of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank’s (China-led) lending, is also reluctant to join the anti-China alliance.”

Robin Niblett, director and chief executive officer of London-based think tank Chatham House, pointed out that the motive for containing China was destined.

“This more comprehensive G7 should have a positive core goal this year …. Don’t try to contain China or oppose Russia, which hasn’t reached an agreement,” he said.

Mr. Niblet called on the group to focus on positive agendas, such as strengthening national economic and technological resilience and agreeing on a common position on upgrading world trade rules at the World Trade Organization.

Agreements in these areas provide a platform for cooperation in sharing digital health data and building smart grids, and are two of today’s biggest global challenges: resilience to the next pandemic and reliance on fossil fuels. You can work on the success of energy conversion from. He added.Anti-Chinese sentiment is useless

What became clear during the surge of G7 ministerial and bilateral conferences was that China remained on the agenda.

In a joint communiqué issued after the G7 meeting, ministers “looked for opportunities to work with China to promote regional and global peace, security and prosperity.”

However, the communiqué did not neglect to mention issues such as Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong in the name of “human rights”.

According to experts, the anti-Chinese sensibilities allegedly touted by certain countries are not only totally irresponsible, but also achieve the highly needed global unity in the most serious pandemic of life history. It doesn’t help to do.

“Why blame China?” Tweeted Tuesday by renowned British scholar and political commentator Martin Jacks. “Western nations have failed due to huge inequality, dire growth, and miserable treatment of COVID, while Trump was the greatest threat to the international order.”

“Governance is not a good word or phrase,” said Jack, a senior researcher at the University of Cambridge’s School of Political and International Studies, in another tweet. “It’s about delivery. Western countries are failing to deliver for their people. China is delivering. That’s why the West is facing serious problems.”

“Treat China with respect. Treat it as your equality. Celebrate the achievements of 1.4 billion people,” Jack added.

In a previous interview, Astrid Nordin, founding director of Lancaster University China Center, told Xinhua that he believed it was not a time of conflict.

She said that “open and open discussions” from all sides are needed to enable cooperation in various fields.China’s irreplaceable role

David Phinnemore, a professor of European politics at Queen’s University Belfast, told Xinhua that the G7 needs to be involved with China in order to remain relevant and tackle global challenges.

“I think it (G7) has always served as a forum for some of the world’s most powerful economists,” he said. “But more and more, it’s just a part, not all as it used to be. So we’re obviously losing a fair amount of power, the economic power there … China is the most obvious. “

“I don’t think we’re in that position. It was decades ago when the G7 was seen by some as the key to what the world would be like economically. It retains the same power and position. I didn’t. That was the case at the time. “

“Don’t exaggerate its influence or importance,” he added. “Don’t overstate expectations about what will happen in the next few years.”

Finnemore, meanwhile, urged the G7 to welcome “healthy competition,” including China, while avoiding competition that would eliminate certain countries.

“Competition can be healthy, but we want to manage it in such a way that its negative effects are minimized and perhaps everyone can benefit from cooperation,” he said.

John Vogler, a professor of international affairs at Keele University, also agreed that the concept of the G7 is “beginning to look a bit outdated” in the current global context.

“If we were thinking of steering the post-pandemic world economy, and actually talking about climate change, it would be inevitable to put China in the room,” he added.

Experts warn against crixism at the end of the G7 meeting

SourceExperts warn against crixism at the end of the G7 meeting

Back to top button