Entertainment

Brooke Shields blew up an interview with Barbara Walters as a “substantial criminal” at the age of 15.

Brooke Shields attacked Barbara Walters following an interview in 1981. In this interview, she was grilled about sexual history at the age of 15.

Dax Shepard is appearing Armchair Expert Podcast, Model, 56, she said in her controversial Calvin Klein campaign that she was “overly sexual,” where she caused a shock wave due to the provocative nature of advertising.

Speaking of an interview where she was asked a series of intimate questions about her sexual history and her measurements by Barbara, the furious Brooke reflected:’It’s a de facto crime. It’s not journalism. “

“It’s a crime in effect”: Brooke Shields attacked Barbara Walters following an interview in 1981. She was grilled about sexual history at the age of fifteen.

Brooke participated in the interview as part of Calvin Klein’s campaign. There she was seen saying to the camera: Nothing “-causing criticism.

Dax admitted that the shocking interview was furious, adding that “the Barbara Walters interview is annoying.”

Brooke also revealed that she was supposed to run a second campaign, but was once dropped. She started to get more Synonymous with jeans from designers.

She explained:that’s why [Calvin].. ..

Shock: Speaking of an interview where she was asked a series of intimate questions about her sexual history and her measurements by Barbara, furious Brooke said:'It's a crime in effect. It's not journalism.

Shock: Speaking of an interview where she was asked a series of intimate questions about her sexual history and her measurements by Barbara, furious Brooke said:’It’s a crime in effect. It’s not journalism. “

“It’s not journalism”: Shield blows up an interview she conducted with Walters in 1981.

“It almost backfired on them. It was as if people were coming for Brooke Shields jeans, but that wasn’t really the goal.

Brooke claimed to be “naive” about the double entender she made famous in the ad-she claimed she was unaware of the nature of the comment.

In an interview with Vogue, Brooke said she was very “protected” and “did not think she was sexual in nature.” She was “shocked” when the media got hooked on it. What she didn’t have.

Repulsion: Brooke faced criticism after appearing in an ad for Calvin Klein in 1980. She asked a famous question.Nothing'; Photograph of November 2021

Repulsion: Brooke faced criticism after appearing in an ad for Calvin Klein in 1980. She asked a famous question.Nothing’; Photograph of November 2021

She states: [The line] It was outright sexual and somehow sexual, so it didn’t get into my mind a bit.

Brooke remembered how Calvin Klein approached his mother, Terry Shields, about putting Brooke in an ad, and she was very excited about the opportunity.

She states: Very unique commercial “

“It didn’t confuse me”: Recently, the actress claimed to be “naive” about the double entender she famously said in the ad.

“The shoot itself didn’t put anyone in the set. I think it was his foray into the commercial world because it was Avedon. I think he was a little nervous. The stakes were pretty high and a lot of pressure. I think there was, “she recalled.

“The choreography was concrete and intentional, little by little,” she continued, with a specific pose with one knee on the ground, the other on the foot, and the other in the air. I looked back.

“I was so proud that they trusted me in something that included acting as well as vision. And it would strike and become part of the zeitgeist, or not. Either it wasn’t, “she said.

Pose: Shield and Walters together in 2016

Pose: Shield and Walters together in 2016

They shot several different ads. It also includes an ad that kicks off her career because of the implication that she wasn’t wearing underwear with jeans.

“I was naive and didn’t think about anything,” she admitted. “I thought it had nothing to do with underwear. I didn’t think it was sexual in nature. For my sister, no one could come between me and my sister. think.

“If they intended double entender, they didn’t explain it to me,” she continued. “It didn’t confuse me. It was obviously sexual and somehow sexual, so it didn’t get into my mind at all.

Counterargument: In an interview with Vogue, Brooke said she was very

Counterargument: In an interview with Vogue, Brooke said she was very “protected” and “did not think she was sexual in nature.”Of her sexuality she didn’t have

Brooke Shields blew up an interview with Barbara Walters as a “substantial criminal” at the age of 15.

Source link Brooke Shields blew up an interview with Barbara Walters as a “substantial criminal” at the age of 15.

Back to top button